There is no definition of 'morals' in human rights law and the European Court of Human Rights affords states a wide margin of appreciation1 in this area2. Expression has been lawfully restricted on this ground where it is sexually explicit, outrages human decency3, or is unduly offensive4, and a distinction is drawn between harsh words that constitute a gratuitous personal attack and those which form part of a public interest debate5.
Restrictions aimed at protecting public health, such as the prohibition of the publication of unverified medical information, have been held to be lawful
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234