The European Court of Human Rights has determined that a person's Article 9 rights1 will not have been interfered with in a given situation if he could have exercised a choice that would have averted the interference2, and that a person who voluntarily accepts a regime which leads to a conflict between his beliefs and the acts which he claims interfere with his beliefs, cannot complain of an interference with his freedom to manifest his beliefs3. United Kingdom courts have followed this approach, albeit with some reluctance
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234