When assessing obviousness it is always necessary to guard against an ex post facto analysis because once the invention has been established, it may be easy to show how it might be arrived at by starting from something known and taking a series of apparently easy steps1. Where the prior art offers many possible starting points for further development it may not be obvious, without hindsight, to choose the one which leads to the alleged invention2.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234