The delivery by mistake of title deeds to a creditor did not constitute him an equitable mortgagee, although the delivery might be prima facie evidence of an intention which threw the burden of proving the negative on the owner1. A deposit of deeds could not create an equitable mortgage on property to which the deeds did not relate, notwithstanding that by a misapprehension the creditor believed that they related to that property2.
Where deeds were delivered for a special purpose other than putting them in pledge, the further purpose of creating a security could not be inferred. Thus where they
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234