Historically it is doubtful that equity had any role in setting aside mistaken transactions, other than to follow the law1. It is true that from the mid-twentieth century a line of authorities evolved which suggested that it had a wider jurisdiction2, stating that equity could not only set aside a transaction for mistake on grounds which, if they existed at law, would result in the parties being not liable to perform3, but could do so also on grounds which would not have that effect at law. But these were discountenanced by the Court
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234