At common law, oral evidence is not in general admissible to show that a written contract, interpreted according to the ordinary rules of construction, does not express the true and complete intention of the parties1. So, at common law, if an agreement is ambiguous, oral evidence as to the intention of the parties with a view to showing that some term or word has been inserted or omitted by mistake is inadmissible
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234