Where instead of basing the exaggeration or puffing upon facts separately stated (in which case each of the two things stands on its own footing, and whereas the one is not a representation at all, the other is wholly so), the representor1 intermingles it with facts, punctuates it by details or quantifies it by figures, the whole of the compound statement is deemed a representation. Thus, if the statement gives rise to a claim where the facts are proved to have been misstated, it is no defence to allege that the facts were buried under a mass of indefinite
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234