In general, an architect has no implied authority1 to contract on behalf of the employer. In the absence of express authority any such purported contract is not binding upon the employer unless he with full knowledge of the facts ratifies the architect's actions2.
However, the question of the liability of the building owner to builders' merchants employed to carry out work contemplated by provisional sums3 has in the past occasioned litigation. This arose generally from three causes: (1) because the builders' merchant declined to take orders from the builder or preferred to take them from the architect, and the architect,
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234