In order to determine a boundary by reference to the provisions of a conveyance, extrinsic evidence is admissible of all material facts existing at the time of execution of the deed, so that the court may have the same knowledge as the parties to the deed then had1. The question is: what would the reasonable layman think he was in fact buying?2. It has been said that such extrinsic evidence is not admissible as an aid to interpreting a conveyance, unless the relevant provisions of the deed are uncertain, contradictory or ambiguous3; but, more recently, that statement has been
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234