The law permits a person, in clearly defined circumstances, to kill or injure a dog in order to protect livestock1, and it is a defence to a charge of destroying or damaging a dog2 to establish the lawful excuse that it was chasing game and that the defendant reasonably believed that his action was necessary to protect his interest in the game3.
But, it seems, a person acting in such a way in protecting game or other animals ferae naturae which have not been either reclaimed or reduced into possession by killing cannot justify what is otherwise an actionable wrong
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234