Where the tenant1 of an agricultural holding2 has sub-let the holding3 and the sub-tenancy terminates4 by operation of law in consequence of the termination of the tenancy by reason of a notice to quit or counter-notice5, the sub-tenant is entitled to compensation for disturbance as if he were a tenant quitting in consequence of such a notice or counter-notice6. Further, the tenant is not debarred from recovering such compensation by reason only that, owing to not being in occupation of the holding, on the termination
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN
TAKE A FREE TRIAL
0330 161 1234