Sign-in Help
Commentary

181 Case E

AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES vol 2(1)
| Commentary

181 Case E

| Commentary

181 Case E1

At the date of the giving of the notice to quit, the interest of the landlord in the agricultural holding had been materially prejudiced by the commission of a breach by the tenant, which was not capable of being remedied, of any term or condition of the tenancy that was not inconsistent with the tenant’s responsibilities to farm in accordance with the rules of good husbandry2, and it is stated in the notice that it is given by reason of that matter.

To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN TAKE A FREE TRIAL TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Stop drafting from scratch and work more productively.
Offering an unrivalled collection of non-litigation precedents for everything specialist and generalist practitioners are likely to encounter.
TAKE A FREE TRIAL Take a free trial Take a free trial