Sign-in Help
Commentary

165 Mislabelling

AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES vol 2(1)
| Commentary

165 Mislabelling

| Commentary

165 Mislabelling

In addition to, and as an alternative to, an allegation that a document falls to be construed otherwise than in accordance with its true terms, or the true relationship of the parties is other than the document itself suggests, founded on an allegation of contracting out or sham, there is a third case that draftsmen of documents relating to agricultural holdings should bear in mind when determining the nature and terms of the documents that they prepare: namely the question of mislabelling. Where a sham is alleged, it is necessary for the court to consider whether the documents

To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN TAKE A FREE TRIAL TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Stop drafting from scratch and work more productively.
Offering an unrivalled collection of non-litigation precedents for everything specialist and generalist practitioners are likely to encounter.
TAKE A FREE TRIAL Take a free trial Take a free trial