Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
 EWCA Civ 1175 were brought together by the Court of Appeal because of the similarity in legal issues.
The Court of Appeal had to determine the contested trade mark application for Cadbury's purple colour and the validity of the registration for a Scrabble tile. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the lower courts had misapplied Directive (EC) 2008/95 (the Directive) and the Trade Marks Act 1994, s 1(1) which define a trade mark as:
Case law has helped to flesh out what these requirements mean in practice and established that colours per se are capable of registration (Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH: C-49/02  All ER (D) 268 (Jun) and Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau: C-104/01  IP & T 187)
A bit of history: in 2004 Cadbury applied to register a trade mark for the colour purple (pantone 2685C) that ‘applied to the whole visible surface, or being the predominant colour applied to the whole visible surface of the packaging of the goods’. Nestle objected that Cadbury’s application was too vague, particularly use of the word ‘predominant’ which was subjective and could in theory protect any colour combination as long as it included purple.
In the High Court (Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Cadbury UK Ltd  EWHC 2637 (Ch),  All ER (D) 06 (Oct)) Birss J rejected Nestle’s argument stating that the word predominant ‘does not introduce any more vagueness or uncertainly than is already present and ac
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234