Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
What are the developments in the world of digital music illustrated by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry’s (IFPI) Digital Music Report 2015? Tahir Basheer, a partner at Sheridans, considers some of the highlights of this report.
The rise of subscription services has highlighted some issues in the way digital royalties are calculated for artists—for example, a number of artists including Thom Yorke and Taylor Swift have openly criticised Spotify for the low level of royalties they pay and have removed their work from the service. Streaming royalties should be dealt with separately in record contracts to take account of the differences from downloads as streaming revenue is based on consumption of music over a continuous period and the accumulation of invoices whereas a download is a one-off purchase.
Other issues include:
How should data from streams be incorporated into the charts (eg how many streams is equal to a track download)?
‘The making available right’
How does the ‘making available right’ and its interpretation change the landscape—this is an exclusive right for authors, performers and phonogram producers to authorise or stop the ‘making available’ of their works over digital networks. Some of these authors, performers and phonogram producers are increasingly using this right as a further weapon in their arsenal to control the exploitation of their records over internet and over other wireless networks (eg by pirates who upload and open up to the public databases containing multiple music tracks without authorisation). Interestingly it is now also being used as a way for the artist to have a say in relation to streaming services, in the way their music is being distributed, even if the streaming service purports to have an agreement with a record company.
Safe harbour provisions
Further pushes to change the safe harbour provisions.
Finally, there is arguably a lack of competition among the biggest streaming providers (which then introduces issues around competition law), although this may change as new services enter the market this year (eg the recent launch of Tidal).
Statutory intervention—so that the normal rules of music licensing apply to, for example, YouTube and its one billion monthly unique users.
Streaming—bundling deals bringing new consumers into the market who may then become subscribers, thus potentially increasing revenues. The ability to stream anywhere (gym, car, mobile) now means that access is effectively being viewed as the same as ownership, although there are also arguments that freemium streaming models are de-valuing music.
It has been suggested that freemium subscription models may be taking away some of the demand for illegal downloads, although this is hard to prove.
The problem with website blocking orders is that the website simply pops up again on a new server (for example Pirate Bay has recently returned after it was shut down in December 2014 following a raid on its servers). There is also the problem of cross-jurisdictional enforcement and the blocking procedure can be expensive and burdensome. Many blame Google and its search facility directing users to pirate sites and argue that it needs to be more pro-active in demoting the appearance of pirate sites in search results and making sure that licensed sites appear at the top.
Piracy will always exist. The solution is to convince consumers of the value of music and offer them access to it at a price that they are happy to pay. The ability to access music on mobile devices has always been regarded as a premium service which can be charged for and there has been a trend to bundle this charge into the handset or mobile Telco fees. I think increasingly accessing music through mobile devices will become the norm and the concept of charging through the mobile telephone bill or through prepaid usage cards, codes or vouchers, almost as an invisible cost, will also become the norm.
Interviewed by Alex Heshmaty.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234