Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In what circumstances are geographical names registrable as trade marks? The challenges are illustrated in the High Court’s ruling in Canary Wharf v The Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks  EWHC 1588 [Ch]
What is this case about?
This case concerns an appeal by Canary Wharf Group (CWG), a London property company, against a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) which refused registration of CWG’s trade mark application for CANARY WHARF (word) filed in March 2013. CWG’s application covered the following goods and services: printed matter (class 16) and services relating to real estate, building construction and design, car parking, landscape design and security (classes 36, 37, 39, 42, 44 and 45). By Decision O-423-14, the Hearing Officer refused the application on the basis of ‘absolute grounds’ as set out in the following provisions of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994):
The Hearing Officer concluded that the application designated the geographic origin of the services (Canary Wharf) and also designated the subject matter of the goods in class 16. All parties agreed that the s. 3(1)(b) and s. 3(1)(c) grounds covered the same area so the High Court appeal was considered in relation to s. 3(1)(c) only.
What is the law in relation to registering geographical names as trade marks?
TMA 1994, s. 3(1()(c) prohibits the registration of trade marks which may serve, in trade, to designate the geographic origin of goods or services. The case of Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions v Huber (Joined Cases C-108 and 109/97)  Ch. 523 provides guidance on the application of s. 3(1)(c) (and its corresponding provision under EU law):
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234