Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Will the recent US spying revelations force the EU to strengthen its data protection law? Rosemary Jay examines the debate surrounding reform and highlights the challenges involved in taking legal action for inter-state breach of privacy.
Are there any international agreements defining the rules of international snooping?
The term ‘international snooping’ covers a potentially wide range of activities. The most obvious meaning is the interception of communications taking place in one jurisdiction by an agency (usually a security agency) of another state. The two main questions are:
As an example, it would be unlawful in the UK for a wife to tap her husband’s phone via the public network but it would not amount to espionage or spying. State espionage (as opposed to industrial espionage) is used to describe the situation when an agent of one state clandestinely obtains secret information about another state or the activities of another state with some element of intent to cause detriment. Espionage of this type is usually a crime under a country’s own law but there is no international treaty or agreement banning such espionage. Press reports since the allegations that US agencies listened to the German Chancellor’s calls have described a no-spying agreement between the UK, US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. However, assuming that those reports are correct, this agreement is not contained in a formal, publicly available international treaty.
It appears therefore that there may be some agreements between some states restricting such activities but these do not take the form of published formal treaties.
Could actions be brought by individuals of one state for breach of privacy by another?
Like laws against espionage, privacy laws and laws against interception of communications are different in different countries. Again, there are several questions:
An individual is not likely to be able to bring criminal charges as, in many countries, these can only be brought by public prosecutors. Even in countries such as the UK where private prosecutions can be brought for some offences, these are not
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234