Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Why did the English courts in Pan Ocean Co Ltd refuse the South Korean administrator’s request to stay termination of contract triggered by insolvency under CBIR, art 21 and what will this decision mean in practice for foreign representatives seeking relief from the English courts?
Pan Ocean Co Ltd Re; Fibria Celulose S/A v Pan Ocean Co Ltd  EWHC 2124 (Ch),  All ER (D) 03 (Jul)
Pan Ocean Co Ltd (the company) was a shipping company incorporated under South Korean law which was in an insolvency process in South Korea. The insolvency was recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006, SI 2006/1030 (CBIR), as a foreign main proceeding. The company had a long-term contract with Fibria Celulose SA (Fibria), which was a Brazilian exporter of wood pulp. The company wished to continue that contract, but Fibria considered it onerous. The contract, which was governed by English law, conferred on Fibria the right to terminate it by reason of the South Korean insolvency process (commonly called an ipso facto clause).
The administrator of the company contended that the ability to terminate was not valid under South Korean law. Fibria contended that was incorrect and, at any rate, the position under South Korean law was irrelevant. The administrator contended that, pursuant to CBIR, the South Korean court had power to grant relief including an order that Fibria should not terminate the contract. He contended that the court had jurisdiction to make an order restraining Fibria from relying on cl28.1 of the contract, pursuant to the court's power under CBIR, art 21(1) to grant 'any appropriate relief'. Fibria submitted that the court had no such power and, alternatively, if such power existed, it should not be used.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234