Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
How will the costs judgment in Cooke v Dunbar Assets Plc shape the laws around bankruptcy orders? Faith Julian of 9 Stone Buildings explores the judgment, which is the first case to consider the issue of costs on an appeal against a bankruptcy order, and looks at the impact it may have on future disputes.
Cooke v Dunbar Assets Plc  EWHC 1888 (Ch),  All ER (D) 07 (Aug)
The Chancery Division ruled that it was permissible to order that the claimant debtor (Mr Cooke), who had unsuccessfully appealed against a bankruptcy order, had to pay the defendant petitioning creditor's (Dunbar) costs. Rule 12.2 of the Insolvency Rules 1986, SI 1986/1925 (IR 1986) did not provide that recovery in accordance with that rule should be the only means by which costs should be recovered. Dunbar had invited the court to make an order within its power under IR 1986, r 7.51A and Part 44 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) that costs of the appeal should fall on the Mr Cooke. Mr Cooke had made himself subject to that regime by appealing. The costs of the appeal did not constitute an expense of the bankruptcy or a provable debt. Accordingly, Mr Cooke was ordered to pay the costs of his unsuccessful appeal. The court held that, to the extent that the costs were not paid by Mr Cooke, they might be treated as an expense of the bankruptcy.
Mr Cooke was made bankrupt on 18 December 2014 on Dunbar’s petition. He appealed against that decision, and was unsuccessful (see Cooke v Dunbar Assets plc  EWHC 579 (Ch),  All ER (D) 49 (Apr)). The parties could not agree how the court ought to deal with the costs of that unsuccessful appeal.
It was agreed that
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234