Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
David Alexander QC andMatthew Abraham at South Square examine the court’s decision in Coilcolor Ltd v Camtrex Ltd which involved an application to restrain the presentation of a winding-up petition.
Coilcolor Ltd v Camtrex Ltd  EWHC 3202 (Ch),  All ER (D) 90 (Nov)
The Companies Court allowed the applicant company’s application to restrain the presentation of a winding-up petition made against it. In the circumstances, the inquiries of fact andcontext required would be far better dealt with by the ordinary process. A petition for winding-up was not a suitable or even proper way to proceed.
The applicant is a purchaser of steel coils. The applicant processes the coils supplied before on sale for use in a variety of applications. The applicant primarily sources its materials from companies based in China andWestern Europe. However, due to lead times that arise in relation to orders from abroad, the applicant sometimes spot buys from stockholders in the UK, such as the respondent, to make up any supply shortfall.
The case involved the purchase of steel coils by the applicant that were invoiced over May andJune 2015 by the respondent. The applicant asserted that there were defects in relation to the coils supplied andas a result did not make payments in relation to certain invoices over those months. The respondent demanded the balance due on the ground that there were no such defects.
Following the applicant’s refusal to make payment until a proper resolution of the defects, the respondent threatened to present a winding-up petition against the applicant in relation to the disputed sums. As a result of the threat to present a winding-up petition the applicant sought an injunction from the court to restrain the respondent from doing so.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234