Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Joseph Wigley, barrister at 4 Stone Buildings, examines the case Re Khan; Reynold Porter Chamberlain LLP v Khan where the court had to determine whether it had jurisdiction to make a bankruptcy order against a Pakistani citizen who contended that he was not ‘ordinarily resident’ in the UK for the purposes of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).
Re Khan; Reynold Porter Chamberlain LLP v Khan  Lexis Citation 9,  All ER (D) 92 (Feb)
The Bankruptcy High Court considered the meaning of ‘ordinarily resident’ and ruled that it had jurisdiction to make a bankruptcy order against the respondent debtor, a member of the Pakistan Senate, notwithstanding that it accepted his evidence that he usually resided in Pakistan. The time he spent in the UK, where his children were schooled, where he owned properties and had business interests, evidenced a degree of permanence. It followed that he had a place of residence in England and Wales in the period mentioned in IA 1986, s 265.
Between August and October 2012, RPC, a firm of solicitors based in the City of London, rendered legal services to Senator Wakar Ahmed Khan (the debtor), a citizen of the Republic of Pakistan who holds diverse business and industrial interests within Pakistan, in connection with proceedings in the Commercial Court brought by Deutsche Bank (Suisse) SA in July 2011.
The debtor, who had previously instructed at least three other firms of solicitors, failed to make any payment in respect of a number of invoices issued by RPC. In August 2014, RPC obtained default judgment in respect of the sums owing. No application was made by the debtor to set aside or otherwise challenge this judgment.
Since obtaining judgment, RPC took enforcement steps. After the debtor had variously avoided and refused to accept service, a statutory demand was served upon
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234