Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In what circumstances can a trustee in bankruptcy be allowed an application for vacant possession? Katherine Hallett of 13 Old Square Chambers comments on the decision in Garwood v Bolter  EWHC 3619 (Ch) that clarifies what a trustee must do procedurally to satisfy the court before it will allow such an application.
The trustee applied for orders for sale with vacant possession in respect of three properties owned by the bankrupt. None of the properties was occupied by the bankrupt—the trustee had made extensive efforts to discover both the identities of the occupiers and the basis of their occupation.
The trustee did not discover the occupiers’ identities—he therefore issued this application against the bankrupt and ‘Persons Unknown’.
During the case, the identities of the occupiers became known. In addition, it was revealed that two of the three properties were occupied under tenancy agreements which the bankrupt had purported to grant after the bankruptcy order. These were not therefore binding on the trustee. The third property was occupied pursuant to an assured shorthold tenancy which apparently pre-dated the bankruptcy and was therefore prima facie binding on the trustee.
HHJ Behrens (sitting as a judge of the High Court) had to determine on appeal whether the district judge at first instance had been correct to dismiss the trustee’s application for vacant possession.
There were two issues:
As to the service point, it was unclear how ‘Persons Unknown’ had originally been served
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234