Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
John McDonnell QC at 13 Old Square Chambers discusses the judgment in Pui-Kwan v Kam-Ho and its implications for insolvency practitioners who agree to be appointed administrators out of court by a company or its directors.
Pui-Kwan v Kam-Ho and others  EWHC 621 (Ch),  All ER (D) 133 (Mar)
The Companies Court held that a company had never been placed in administration where a meeting of its directors, purporting to enter it into administration, pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), Sch B1, para 22(2), had been inquorate.
The application concerned a BVI company (Melodious Corporation) which the parties, who were both from Hong Kong, acquired in 1995 to hold their intended matrimonial home in England. They separated in 1998 which resulted in litigation reported as Chan v Leung  All ER (D) 455 (Nov) and  EWCA Civ 1075 where the full history can be found. Mr Leung (who held 49% of Melodious) sought to have it wound up and Miss Chan (who held 51%) sought to establish a beneficial interest in the house and the right to remain there until she finished a course of studies. Miss Chan was successful and the court held:
Six years after the conclusion of that litigation Mr Leung had returned to Hong Kong and become bankrupt, the house was still unsold and Miss Chan was advised to consult an insolvency practitioner. He advised her to register Melodious as an overseas company with a
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234