Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Richard Ascroft, barrister at Guildhall Chambers, discusses the case of Weir (as trustee in bankruptcy of Claire Elisabeth Hilsdon) v Hilsdon, which provides a worthwhile clarification on the suspension of discharge from bankruptcy.
Weir (as trustee in bankruptcy of Claire Elisabeth Hilsdon) v Hilsdon  EWHC 983 (Ch),  All ER (D) 33 (May)
The Chancery Division allowed, on one ground only, a bankrupt’s appeal against a district judge's order, suspending her discharge from bankruptcy until her trustee in bankruptcy confirmed to the court that she had complied with her duties. The court held, among other things, that a suspension of the discharge until the trustee confirmed to the court that the bankrupt had complied with his duties and obligations, or until the court otherwise ordered, satisfied the statutory requirement that the suspension be until the fulfilment of a specified condition. Accordingly, such an order was not always wrong in principle. However, the court held that, in the present case, the district judge's decision to impose an order in the form that he had was flawed for the failure to take into account the range of orders that could have been made, under s 279(3) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), and for the failure to consider whether the bankrupt’s failings had really justified an order in that form. The order was set aside and replaced with one imposing a fixed period of six months.
On 9 February 2016 District Judge Payne (sitting in the County Court at Oxford) made an order suspending Mrs Hilsdon’s otherwise automatic discharge from bankruptcy in response to an admitted failure by her to comply with her statutory obligations under IA 1986. The order was expressed as follows:
‘The relevant period for the purposes of section 279 of IA 1986 and Schedule 19 to the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002) shall cease to run until such time as
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234