Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
How should a liquidator handle a request for his removal under section 177 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and the Insolvency Rules 1986 (IR 1986)? Warren Bank of St Philips Stone Chambers reports, in the light of recent High Court ruling.
Kean v Lucas (as liquidator of J&R Builders (Norwich) Ltd))  EWHC 2684 (Ch),  All ER (D) 50 (Nov)
IA 1986, s 177 provides the mechanism under which a liquidator may be removed from office. In the case of a creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL), only a specially-summoned general meeting of the company’s creditors may do so, ‘…in accordance with the rules’ (IA 1986, s 177(2)(b)).
IR 1986, SI 1986/1925, r 4.114, states that the liquidator shall summon a meeting to remove him under IA 1986, s 177(2)(b) ‘if requested by 25 per cent in value of the creditors, excluding those who are connected with it’.
Of equal importance is IR 1986, SI 1986/1925, r 4.57, which provides that any request by creditors to the liquidator for a meeting to be summoned shall be accompanied by a list of the creditors concurring with the request and the amount of their respective claims in the winding up.
Mrs Kean had requested the liquidator of J&R Builders (Norwich) Limited (the company) to convene a meeting of creditors under IA 1986, s 177 to consider his removal as liquidator. She had made the request in her capacity as ‘a significant creditor and former director and shareholder’ of the company. The liquidator refused to requisition the meeting on the ground that the request was not supported by 25% in value of the company’s creditors, as required by IR 1986, SI 1986/1925, r 4.114, and required ‘strict proof’ of the claim. Mrs Kean applied to Mr Registrar Briggs for a declaration that the liquidator
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234