Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Eleanor Temple, barrister at Kings Chambers, explores Day v Refulgent Ltd and explains why petitioners and litigants should not turn up at a bankruptcy petition hearing and expect to get an adjournment.
Day v Refulgent Ltd  EWHC 7 (Ch),  All ER (D) 21 (Jan)
The Chancery Division, in dismissing an appeal against a bankruptcy order, held that there had been a clear and careful judgment by the district judge, who had reached a decision that had been well open to her on the evidence.
This was an application by Mr Day for permission to appeal a bankruptcy order made against him by District Judge Kelly. The application for permission to appeal was listed at the same time as the appeal.
The brief background to this matter was that the respondent in this case (and petitioner in bankruptcy), Refulgent Ltd, had brought proceedings in the High Court against Mr Day and another. Pending the hearing of those proceedings, Refulgent had obtained a freezing order over Mr Day’s worldwide assets. As a result of court hearings regarding that order, Mr Day had been ordered to pay costs of £30,000 to Refulgent. Mr Day should have paid these costs by 24 December 2014, but failed to do so. Therefore, Refulgent presented a bankruptcy petition and Mr Day sought to defend that petition. He did so on several grounds, including:
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234