Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
The collapse of nationwide clothing retailer BHS has prompted much concern about many issues ranging from pension fund deficits to abuse of limited liability laws. Owing to the complexity and scale of the problem, the Parliamentary Select Committee called on expert advice from barristers at South Square. Hannah Thornley explains the role of the South Square team, giving insight as to why their input was called on, and whether or not we might see more of such arrangements in future.
Gabriel Moss QC, myself and Ryan Perkins, all from South Square, were appointed as specialist legal advisers to the Work and Pensions and Business, Innovation and Skills Committees in May 2016. Our role was to review evidence, assist with the drafting of questions and the analysing of answers, attend the evidence sessions, provide assistance to the MPs and brief them on relevant areas of questioning.
We were advising on company and insolvency law, which is one of the reasons why we were chosen to assist because that is the main specialism of our Chambers, South Square.
There are various investigations that are ongoing. The administrators of BHS (Duff & Phelps) resigned recently and new administrators (FRP Advisory) have been appointed. We have been appointed as counsel for FRP Advisory, so cannot comment any further.
Yes, we were appointed directly by the Work and Pensions Select Committee and our role with the select committees ended upon the publication of the report.
The failure of BHS was unusual in terms of the combination of the large pension scheme deficit, the unusual circumstances of the sale of the company and its nature as a longstanding nationwide employer. That was why the joint inquiry was launched. I would disagree that this was a trial by MPs. This was a very helpful evidence gathering exercise by the two committees in relation to the failure. I do not think that such inquiries will become more common.
I hope so, as I feel that we were able to assist the MPs and their staff from a different, purely legal and questioning perspective, which is one of the reasons why they managed to gain so much helpful evidence. This in turn will hopefully be used to provide the basis for changes in the law so as to give better protection to employees and pension schemes in the future.
Interviewed by Julian Sayarer.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234