Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Cleon Catsambis, barrister at 39 Essex Chambers and counsel for the applicant, sets out the test used to establish a cross-claim in order to restrain a winding-up petition.
Re a company (No 5245 of 2017)  EWHC 275 (Ch),  All ER (D) 128 (Feb)
This case considered and applied the threshold test for having a ‘genuine and serious cross-claim’ in respect of applications for injunctions to restrain winding-up petitions. In applications of this kind, the court has to balance the competing rights and interests of an undisputed creditor with those of a debtor facing potential winding-up, but which asserts a cross-claim that exceeds the value of the debt.
It is clear that bare assertions will not suffice, and that spurious or last-minute cross-claims should not be permitted to defeat undisputed debts. However, a cross-claim need not be fully particularised or evidenced in order to satisfy the test. There is also no requirement to have issued proceedings (although any delay in doing so may be a relevant consideration).
The court in this case summarised the relevant legal principles and re-affirmed that the court would not engage in a detailed examination of the cross-claim. Provided the cross-claim was one of substance, the court would proceed cautiously and, in the absence of special circumstances, allow a debtor company the opportunity to establish its cross-claim in ordinary civil proceedings.
M issued a statutory demand on L in respect of a debt pursuant to a loan agreement. L did not dispute the debt, but it sought an injunction to restrain M from presenting, advertising or otherwise publicising a winding-up petition on the basis that it had a cross-claim against M
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234