Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: How would insolvency litigation fare if the Jackson exemptions were removed? A recent report from R3 discusses the likely effect should the current exemption applying to insolvency be lifted after April 2015.
R3 Report on Jackson exemption
R3 with the support of ACCA, ICAEW, ICAS, IPA, JLT Speciality Ltd, Moore Stephens LLP and Moon Beever commissioned an independent academic report into the likely effect of the Jackson reforms on insolvency litigation should this exemption expire in April next year. The report, carried out by Professor Peter Walton from the University of Wolverhampton (published April 2014) found a number of consequences for creditors should insolvency litigation not receive a permanent exemption from the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012).
The Jackson reforms for general civil litigation were brought about to tackle the escalating problem of legal costs disproportionate to the value of legal claims. In 2012 insolvency litigation was granted an temporary exemption from the Jackson reforms in LASPO 2012--the exemption is due to expire in April 2015.
Insolvency litigation is brought by independent professionals in the public interest and ultimately helps protect the public purse, already achieving the original aims of Jackson's reforms. Under the current regime the defendant pays the costs if they have lose an insolvency litigation case--under the new regime, the costs of the conditional fee arrangements and after-the-event insurance will not be recoverable from the defendant, it will come from the insolvent estate.
This will have a serious impact on the insolvency litigation regime in England and Wales. R3, the trade body for the insolvency profession, has been arguing that insolvency litigation differs from standard civil litigation and that it should be granted a permanent exemption from LASPO.
Not a subscriber? Find out more about how LexisPSL can help you and click here for a free trial of LexisPSL Restructuring and Insolvency.
First published on LexisPSL Restructuring and Insolvency on 12 September 2014
0330 161 1234