Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Does legal professional privilege attaching to information and documents of a bankrupt devolve to his trustee in bankruptcy? James Mather, barrister at Serle Court, examines the Court of Appeal’s answer to this question in Avonwick Holdings v Shlosberg.
Avonwick Holdings Ltd and others v Shlosberg  EWCA Civ 1138
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the bankrupt respondent’s principal creditor and trustees in bankruptcy against an order that the trustees’ solicitors stop acting also for the creditor in respect of any matter relating to the respondent or his affairs. The trustees had passed documents to their solicitors which belonged to the respondent and were subject to legal professional privilege. The trustees argued that they had acquired the benefit of the privilege and could waive it to allow the creditor to deploy the information in proceedings against the respondent. However, the Court of Appeal held that the privilege attaching to information and documents of a bankrupt was not property which vested in the trustees in bankruptcy under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).
The respondent, Mr Shlosberg, is a Russian businessman domiciled in England against whom his principal creditor Avonwick Holdings (Avonwick), after a substantial trial, obtained a judgment in November 2014 in the sum of $195m plus interest. Mr Shlosberg failed to pay the debt and was bankrupted on Avonwick’s petition in January 2015.
Avonwick was represented in the proceedings against Mr Shlosberg by solicitors who were also appointed to act as legal advisers by Mr Shlosberg’s trustees in bankruptcy (trustees).
The trustees exercised their powers under IA 1986, s 311(1) to obtain privileged and confidential documents in the hands of Mr Shlosberg’s former solicitors. The trustees passed those documents on to their solicitors, who read them in detail. The solicitors imposed no information barriers between those acting for Avonwick and those acting
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234