Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Christopher Burt, solicitor at Moon Beever, considers the recent High Court decision in Parker v Nicholson and others clarifying an office-holder’s right to delegate decision making.
Parker v Nicholson and others  EWHC 3881 (Ch),  All ER (D) 278 (Nov)
The Bankruptcy High Court dismissed an application for directions made by the applicant trustee, P, as to whether to admit a proof of debt filed by the respondent liquidators and whether a meeting of creditors should be convened at the liquidators' request. P's role was to make hard decisions such as the one in the present case. Such applications were to be discouraged.
Insolvency practitioners are routinely required to make difficult decisions in their insolvent estates. One of the perennial challenges is the adjudication of creditor claims when hotly contested by the underlying insolvent party and his/her/its creditors. Office-holders find themselves in an uncomfortable position and there is naturally some attraction in delegating contentious adjudications to third parties, such as the court. The Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides that office-holders may apply to court for directions on matters arising in their estates. The key question in this case was to what extent can an office-holder refuse to make a decision—in particular adjudicating on a proof of debt—but instead to refer the matter to the court?
Mr Parker was appointed trustee in bankruptcy of Michael Paul Chinn with effect from 3 December 2014. The trustee proceeded to investigate the affairs of the bankrupt, instruct solicitors and begin asset realisation work. However he did not adjudicate—not even for voting purposes—on the proofs of debt that had been filed with him. The most substantial of these proofs was from the liquidators of one of the bankrupt’s former companies in the sum of £4.4m.
Correspondence commenced and the joint
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234