Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
This judgment is significant for the issues it raises, both with regard to the conflicts and the court’s willingness to sanction office-holder decisions and with regard to disciplinary investigations. Comet’s joint liquidators (who were also its former joint administrators) applied for directions under section 112 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), effectively permitting them not to carry out any further investigation into the validity of a debenture held by a special purpose vehicle (HAL) that had been granted by Comet within twelve months of its collapse into administration. The liquidators also sought a direction that they be permitted to transfer a further tranche of funds to HAL that had been realised under the floating charge contained within the debenture. The application was made in the light of a disciplinary investigation launched by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (ICAEW), the liquidators’ regulator, into the conduct of the former administrators and that of their firm, Deloitte LLP. The ICAEW was made respondent to the application. After a three-day hearing, the judge—who expressed serious concerns about the office-holders’ conduct both before and after their appointment as administrators—refused the application and was not prepared to make any order that might afford, protection to the liquidators in the ICAEW disciplinary proceedings. Among other things, the judge cited what Neuberger J said in Re T&D Industries plc: ‘... a person appointed to act as an administrator may be called upon to make important and urgent decisions. He has a responsible and potentially demanding role. Commercial and administrative decisions are for him, and the court is not there to act as a sort of bomb shelter for him.’ Written by Marcia Shekerdemian QC, barrister at Wilberforce Chambers.
Re Comet Group Ltd (in liquidation); Kahn and another (in their capacity as the joint liquidators of Comet Group Ltd) v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales  EWHC 1378 (Ch)
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234