Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
The financial services "melt down" has raised a number of interesting questions on certain stakeholders and their entitlement to certain assets. The complexity deepens when you have Financial Services "law", such as Chapters 7 and 7A (CASS 7 and 7A) of the Client Assets Sourcebook section of the Financial Services Authority and its interaction with insolvency law and the "waterfall" of payments.
The MF Global case (under administration) raised significant questions regarding an individual’s client money entitlement.
We spoke to Felicity Toube QC at South Square Chambers to explore the issues and look at the ‘hindsight principle’.
The main issue arising in the context of the collapse of MF Global was whether an individual’s client money entitlement should be valued as at the date of the primary pooling event (PPE) (in this case administration) by reference to the market value or any mark-to-market valuation on that date, or whether it should be valued at the sum for which it was in fact liquidated. Often (but not always) contingent claims in liquidation are valued by using the value which eventuates. This is referred to as the ‘hindsight principle’. This issue will arise in the context of every collapsed firm, as it will always be necessary to value an individual’s client money entitlement.
David Richards J decided (following In re Global Trader Europe Ltd (in l
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234