Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Michael Leeds, director, and Nick Wood, partner, of the Fraud Insolvency Division (FInD) of Grant Thornton UK LLP discuss some of the issues insolvency practitioners consider when contemplating the use of funding.
This is part two of a three-part blog series on litigation funding republished with the permission of Vannin Capital. The links to the other articles are provided at the end of the article.
In many insolvency cases there are likely to be limited assets or, in especially desperate cases, no assets at all. So, how can the Insolvency Practitioner (IP) realise value for the creditors if there is a suspicion that assets have been dissipated and there is an angry creditor (or angry creditors) who want their money back?
A number of cases within our FInD portfolio have no assets and yet either fraud is suspected or there may be potential claims against third parties. We are engaged on the following scenarios:
Usually there are pro-active creditors looking for a route to money where they have been unable to recover anything. They have taken steps to put the company into an insolvency process to enable an investigation to be undertaken and assets recovered using the powers given to the IP under the Insolvency Act 1986.
As set out above it is often the case that an insolvent company will have no assets on its balance sheet and no cash at bank. What the IP focusses on is recovering assets which are off the balance sheet.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234