Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
June 2016 highlights from the Lexis®PSL Restructuring and Insolvency team. This month’s highlights include: initial reactions to the Brexit vote, a look at the key dates under the Recast Regulation 848/2015, Linklaters’ views on the pre-pack recommendations, key changes proposed under the government’s recent consultation to reform the corporate insolvency framework, our latest On the Edge guide to matrimonial law plus a round up of other interesting cases and developments.
On 23 June 2016, the UK voted to leave the EU, sending shock waves across the markets and economies worldwide. While it will be several months before the full implications can begin to be understood, we look at some of the likely impacts on R&I lawyers and professionals.
For further details on the likely impact on R&I lawyers, see News Analyses:
Brexit—initial views on some likely impacts for R&I professionals
Brexit—implications for the UK restructuring and insolvency market
Lexis®PSL are reviewing our content on the basis of information available and will keep it under regular review throughout the withdrawal period. In the meantime, for background reading, links to related guidance and policy documents and the latest analysis on any potential effects on our content, please refer to our EU referendum subtopic and Brexit guide.
Paul Sidle, Rebecca Jarvis, Richard Bussell, Richard Hodgson and Mandip Englund of Linklaters discuss Teresa Graham's six recommendations on how to improve confidence and transparency in ‘connected party’ pre-packs—broadly, where the former directors or owners are the buyers.
For further details, see News Analysis: Keeping pre-packs afloat.
The Insolvency Service is consulting on four proposals which would significantly change the options available to a company in financial distress. The proposals are:
For further details on these proposals, including what the consequences of the new cram down procedure and the rescue finance proposal might be, see News Analysis: Review of the corporate insolvency frame-work.
The majority of the provisions of the Recast Regulation 848/2015 are not effective until 26 June 2017—this is to allow Member States to familiarise themselves with the new provisions. The original EC Regulation on Insolvency 1346/2000 will continue to apply to proceedings opened before the Recast Regulation comes into force, although the continued effect of each for the UK in light of the Brexit vote is now unclear. The exceptions are:
For further details, see News Analysis: Recast Regulation—key dates.
Bataillon and another v Shone and another  EWHC 1174 (QB),  All ER (D) 199 (May)
The recent case of Bataillon and another v Shone and another is a significant recent example of a case confirming that, for determined claimants using the right litigation tools, it is possible to achieve significant results and recoveries notwithstanding the deliberate dissipation of assets by defendants. Daniel Saoul, barrister at 4 New Square, who acted for the claimants in this case, articulates the importance of the judgment.
Insolvency law contains summary processes for dealing with claims and protections against certain pro-ceedings commencing or continuing. There has been some debate, and recent case law, concerning the primacy of these rules over agreements to arbitrate. Stewart Perry, partner in Clyde & Co’s insolvency and reorganisation team and member of the Lexis®PSL Restructuring and Insolvency Consulting Editorial board, looks at what the current position is under English law and beyond.
Re Cosy Seal Insulation Ltd (in administration); Ross v Gaffney  EWHC 1255 (Ch),  All ER (D) 29 (Jun)
Oberon Kwok, barrister at St Philips Chambers, outlines that while the decision in Re Cosy Seal Insulation grants some practical knowledge to lawyers, there are legal issues, namely relating to carbon credits and the nature of ‘transaction’, that remain ambiguous. For further details, see News Analysis: Director not insulated from liability on insolvency.
On the 30 June 2016, the Official Receiver’s Lloyds bank account will close. The Insolvency Service has published on its website the details of the Government Banking Services which are now being used by the Official Receiver. This will apply to monies paid in to bankruptcies and compulsory liquidations.
Hinton (trustee in bankruptcy of Wotherspoon) v Wotherspoon  EWHC 621 (Ch),  All ER (D) 43 (Jun)
Can a bankrupt’s pension income which is the subject of a drawdown arrangement be taken into account when a trustee in bankruptcy applies for an income payments order? Peter Shaw, of 9 Stone Buildings, ex-plains the Chancery Division’s answer in Hinton v Wotherspoon. For further details, see News Analysis: Court considers income payments orders and pensions.
Gardner v Lemma Europe Insurance Company Ltd (in liquidation)  EWCA Civ 484,  All ER (D) 175 (May)
In what circumstances would it be appropriate for a court to lift an automatic stay to allow a party to pursue arbitration? Charlotte Cooke, barrister at South Square, considers how the Court of Appeal decision in Gardner v Lemma Europe Insurance Company informs our understanding of the court’s discretion. For further details, see News Analysis: Lifting a stay to pursue arbitration.
In an article for Law360, Jonathan Randles looks at the US Supreme Court’s recent decision dealing a heavy blow to Puerto Rico’s restructuring laws. Puerto Rico, which is facing $70bn in public debt, passed a law in 2014 that would have restructured the debt of its financially struggling public utilities. For further details, see News Analysis: High Court ends Puerto Rico's restructuring law.
Hosking (as joint liquidators of Hellas Telecommunications (Luxembourg) II SCA) v Slaughter and May  EWCA Civ 474,  All ER (D) 173 (May)
Can liquidators seek a detailed assessment of solicitors’ fees previously agreed by administrators? Hilary Stonefrost, barrister at South Square, explains the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hosking v Slaughter and May. The court held that on the construction of rule 7.34 of the Insolvency Rules 1986, SI 1986/1925 (IR 1986) that was in force at the time, the liquidators had no jurisdiction to ask the court to direct a detailed assessment of fees agreed and paid by administrators. It decided that IR 1986, SI 1986/1925, r 7.34(1) (a) did not apply to administrations because there could be no reference to 'administration' in that rule unless words were added. For further details, see News Analysis: Revisiting fees agreed by administrators.
IFRS 16, a new accounting standard relating to the accounting treatment of leases, takes effect from 1 January 2019 and introduces a single lessee accounting model. The Loan Market Association (LMA) has incorporated changes for IFRS 16 into LMA facility documentation.
Shlosberg v Avonwick Holdings Ltd and others  EWHC 1001 (Ch),  All ER (D) 76 (May)
Does a trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) acquire the benefit of the bankrupt’s legal professional privilege? And if not, what impact might that have on a TIB's investigations? Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers considers the decision in Shlosberg v Avonwick Holidings Ltd. For further details, see News Analysis: Trustees in bankruptcy and privilege—a spanner in the works?
Re The Copenhagen Reinsurance Company (UK) Ltd and another  EWHC 944 (Ch),  All ER (D) 25 (May)
According to Joe Bannister, partner at Hogan Lovells, the major lesson from Copenhagen Re is the im-portance the courts continue to place upon the quality of supporting evidence and levels of disclosure when considering both transfer schemes (also known as part VII schemes or insurance business transfer schemes) and schemes of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006. For further details, see News Analysis: Transfer schemes—breaking new ground?
Re A Company  EWHC 1046 (Ch),  All ER (D) 103 (May)
Is a winding-up petition bound to be struck out where there is a clash of evidence, and notwithstanding a challenge to the credibility of the company’s evidence? Elaine Palser of 9 Stone Buildings considers the recent decision of Gabriel Moss QC (sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court) in Re A Company. For further details, see News Analysis: Bold petitioning creditors beware.
Re Sports Management Group Ltd (in Liquidation); Green (as liquidator of Sports Management Group Ltd) v Marston and another  Lexis Citation 55,  All ER (D) 208 (May)
What are the difficulties when identifying the de facto director after a company has gone into liquidation? Gemma Witherington, barrister at Hardwicke, explores the issues faced by Registrar Derrett when trying to determine the de facto director of the Sports Management Group Ltd and highlights the lessons that can be learnt from the judgment. For further details, see News Analysis: Pinpointing the de facto director.
Guidance on issues around bankruptcy when living abroad has been published by the Money Advice Service and the Insolvency Service. The guidance outlines the options for going bankrupt in England and Wales and the consequences of bankruptcy.
 UKSC 30,  All ER (D) 133 (Jun)
The Supreme Court held in dismissing the appeal that the purpose and effect of the transactions between the group of companies in Scotland prior to administration was to divert assets away from the companies' creditors contrary to section 242 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). There had been no reciprocity be-tween the disposals and the earlier payment made to the bank. That they were gratuitous alienations was plain and obvious.
 Lexis Citation 69,  All ER (D) 103 (Jun)
The Companies Court held that it had an unfettered discretion (under IR 1986, SI 1986/1925, r 9.6(4)) to award legal costs to an examinee examined on the application of joint liquidators, under IA 1986, s 236, as part of an inquiry into the dealings of two companies in liquidation. An order was made providing for the reasonable costs of the respondent's representation at the examination. However, given the narrow scope of IR 1986, SI 1986/1925, r 9.6(4), no order was made requiring the joint liquidators to pay the respondent's pre-application costs, save to the extent that they could be said to be of, and incidental to, the examination in the strictest sense.
There have been developments on the following cases this month:
This is a shortened version of the Lexis®PSL Restructuring and Insolvency monthly highlights for June 2016 that was first published on Lexis®PSL Restructuring and Insolvency.
Find out more about how Lexis®PSL can help you and click here for a free trial of Lexis®PSL Restructuring and Insolvency.
0330 161 1234