Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
What can we learn from a recent High Court decision where the court made a winding-up order on just and equitable grounds over a family-run company?
In the case of Re Brand & Harding Ltd  EWHC 247 (Ch),  All ER (D) 136 (Feb), Mrs Justice Rose wound up a company on just and equitable grounds, pursuant to section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), where there had been a breakdown in mutual trust and confidence, which impeded the management of the company between its shareholders, two sisters.
The company subject to the petition was owned by sisters (the shareholders). The company ran a 242 acre farm. The petition was issued on the basis that the shareholders had reached a deadlock in that they contended that they could not agree on the management of the company. In addition there had been cross-accusations of misconduct, which had led to bitter acrimony and they could not agree on any matter relating to the future governance of the company. Therefore a winding-up petition was issued by the shareholders seeking an order to wind-up the company, pursuant to IA 1986, s 122(1)(g) on the grounds that it was just and equitable that the company be wound up.
The court granted the order to wind-up the company on just and equitable grounds.
In considering whether or not it was appropriate to make the winding-up order, the court decided that the fact the company was a small/private company was not enough in itself to satisfy the legal test for winding-up on just and equitable grounds. There had to be something more for the court to make the order. Such factors might include:
When looking at whether any of these sort of factors applied, the court addressed the following matters in respect of the company:
The court found it was clear that the company had been intended to be run as a quasi-partnership—it was in deadlock and was likely to remain so. There had been a clear breakdown in mutual trust and confidence, and this was detrimental to the management and running of the business. As there was no other alternative remedy, the court wound the company up.
Given the provisions in section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, these type of petitions are quite rare. The case clearly sets out the matters the court will expect to see and take into account when granting an order to wind-up a company on just and equitable grounds. As the case points out, there needs to be more than just a small and privately owned company. There needs to be additional factors (such as deadlock, or a breakdown in mutual trust and confidence) and no alternative remedy.
Benn Richards, solicitor in the Lexis®PSL Restructuring & Insolvency team.
If you are a LexisPSL subscriber, click the link below for further information:
When a winding-up petition can be issued and a company wound up by the court
Not a subscriber? Find out more about how LexisPSL can help you and click here for a free trial of LexisPSL Restructuring and Insolvency.
First published on LexisPSL Restructuring and Insolvency
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234