Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
The court was concerned with public interest winding-up petitions presented against companies which operated schemes to help customers to avoid liability for business rates. The schemes involved the setting up of special purpose vehicles (SPVs) which would accept liability in principle for business rates in respect of a property, and which would shortly afterwards be placed into members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL), thus exempting them from liability for business rates. While the schemes were artificial, they were nevertheless genuine and legally effective. The court held that there was nothing objectionable against companies which operated such tax avoidance schemes. Oberon Kwok, barrister at Selbourne Chambers, considers the judgment, the background to the case and the practical implications.
PAG Asset Preservation Ltd—MB Vacant Property Solutions Ltd  EWHC 2890 (Ch)
This case demonstrates that it is legitimate to use the MVL or creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL) process for the intended effect of tax avoidance, as long as the objective purpose of the liquidation does not stray from the collection, realisation and distribution of assets. Provided that is the case, the courts are unlikely to strike down such arrangements.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234