Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
The Housing and Planning Act 2016 introduces a range of housing and planning related reforms, including a special administration regime for registered providers of social housing at risk of insolvency proceedings, which places their affairs under the management of a housing administrator appointed by the court. Kate Cook, senior knowledge lawyer in the Housing Finance Team at Addleshaw Goddard LLP, discusses the key features and objectives of housing administration.
Housing administration was introduced by Part 4, Chapter 5 of Schedule 5 to the Housing and Planning Act 2016 (HPA 2016). It was the brainchild of the regulator of social housing (the regulator) which felt it needed wider reaching powers to deal with the insolvency of a large or complex private registered provider (RP) of social housing. This came about due to lessons learned from the near failure of Cosmopolitan Housing Group and RPs’ increased diversification, debt levels and exposure to the housing market.
The key features of housing administration are:
The housing administrator has two objectives. Objective 1 is to:
Objective 2 is to ensure that the RP’s social housing remains in the regulated housing sector (ie owned by an RP) (HPA 2016, s 98).
Objective 1 takes priority over Objective 2 but the housing administrator must work towards both objectives so far as possible (HPA 2016, s 96(2)).
The original drafting of the Housing and Planning Bill made retention of social housing stock in the sector the primary objective of a housing administration. This was amended in response to concerns raised by the sector that this would have prevented market value subject to tenancies being used as a valuation basis (as existing use would have had to be maintained)—this could have caused an adverse impact on asset cover tests, leading to a raft of defaults across the sector.
The powers of the housing administrator are broadly similar to those an administrator has under an ‘ordinary’ administration of a company pursuant to the Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).
HPA 2016, Sch 5 applies a number of IA 1986, Sch B1 provisions, tailored to RPs. However, HPA 2016, Sch 5 applies only to RPs which are companies. Further regulations are required in order to formalise how a housing administration would be conducted in respect of an RP which is a CBS or CIO. Draft regulations have been laid before Parliament but not agreed (see further below).
The two schemes are broadly similar, although the devil is in the detail so it cannot be assumed that they dovetail in all respects. Indeed, there will be differences between the approach for each of companies, CBSs and CIOs, which insolvency practitioners will need to be familiar with in the (hopefully unlikely) event that a housing administration order is required.
It is perhaps also worth considering the differences from a secured creditor’s perspective between the housing administration regime and the HRA 2008 moratorium.
Under HRA 2008, secured creditors have a right of veto over any proposals made for the future of the RP. They do not have this in a housing administration, and a housing administration order also trumps the rights of secured creditors to take any step to enforce their security pending the end of the housing administration.
On the other hand, housing administration should offer a familiar regime with clear rules and objectives, established case law and expertise. In addition, there are arguments that a managed work-out will provide more stability and certainty for all concerned. Some may see this as preferable to a scramble to appoint Law of Property Act receivers (where there is no single security trustee) and the practical difficulties a Law of Property Act receiver could face in managing a large property portfolio without access to the whole business.
Aside from making the necessary secondary legislation under the HPA 2016, the Secretary of State does not have any specific powers relating to the day-to-day management of a housing administration beyond making the application to court for a housing administration order (or approving such an application by the regulator). Once a housing administration order is made, the process will for the most part be run by the housing administrator, an officer of the court and qualified insolvency practitioner, with the involvement of the court where necessary.
The Secretary of State does, however, have notable powers relating to the financing of housing administrations, including to:
Prior to an RP entering into housing administration, the Secretary of State also has the power to consent to the regulator waiving the 28-day notice period applicable to winding up petitions and other creditor action against the RP.
In short, no.
The HPA 2016 put the broad framework for housing administration in place but it needs to be supplemented by regulations and rules.
The Regulations will apply housing administration to registered societies and CIOs (HPA 2016, Sch 5 gave further details of the conduct of housing administration only in relation to companies). This is an important step given the majority of RPs are CBSs. A draft of the Insolvency of Registered Providers of Social Housing Regulations 2018 was laid in Parliament on 7 February 2018 but has not yet been agreed.
The rules are expected to provide the detail of how housing administration will work in practice but these are not yet in the public domain, having been delayed by factors, including the need to first implement the new Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, SI 2016/1024.
Interviewed by Susan Ghaiwal
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
If you are a LexisPSL subscriber, click the links below for further information:
Administration - overview
Social housing finance - overview
Not a subscriber? Find out more about how LexisPSL can help you and click here for a free trial of LexisPSL Restructuring and Insolvency.
0330 161 1234