Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Discussing the judgment in Re Ralls Builders Ltd (No 2), Christopher Boardman, a barrister at Radcliffe Chambers, says the case is an illuminating example of the problems and difficult decisions directors of insolvent companies face when considering how to properly conduct themselves and avoid potential liabilities.
Re Ralls Builders Ltd (in liquidation); Grant and another v Ralls and others  EWHC 1812 (Ch),  All ER (D) 113 (Jul)
The Chancery Division ruled that, having found that the joint liquidators’ application, under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), for a contribution from the directors of a company on a wrongful trading claim, had failed, it would not beappropriate to make the directors pay a contribution to the assets of the company in respect of the joint liquidators’ fees and expenses in investigating and pursuing that unsuccessful claim.
This was a claim for wrongful trading pursuant to IA 1986, s 214. The liquidators, Steven Grant of Wilkins Kennedy and James Tickell of Portland, sought a £1.5m contribution to the company’s assets from the three former directors of a South East building company that had gone into administration during the course of the last recession. The liquidators alleged that the directors knew or ought to have known by 31 July 2010, alternatively 31 August 2010, that the company could not avoid insolvent liquidation and had taken no steps to protect the interests of creditors until it went into administration on 13 October 2010.
The trial took place in June 2015. In February 2016, the judge handed down his main substantive judgment: Re Ralls Builders Ltd (in liquidation); Grant and another (Joint Liquidators of Ralls Builders Ltd) v Ralls and others  EWHC 243 (Ch),  All ER (D) 142 (Feb). The judge found that although the directors ought to have known that
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234