Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Daniel Smith, counsel, and Kavan Bakhda, associate, at Latham & Watkins examine the Supreme Court’s judgment in Akers v Samba Financial Group in relation to the effect of section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and the lex situs on transfers of trust property.
Akers and others v Samba Financial Group  UKSC 6,  All ER (D) 06 (Feb)
The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the appellant Saudi Arabian bank and held that a trustee’s transfer to it of shares he was alleged to have been holding on trust for the fourth respondent, a Cayman Islands company in liquidation, had not been a disposition within the meaning of IA 1986, s 127. Therefore, the claim by the fourth respondent and its liquidators that the transfer was void had no prospect of success.
The issue arose out of the long-running multi-billion fallout concerning the Al-Gosaibi family, Maan Al Sanea and the Saad Group of companies. In 2009 the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands ordered Saad Investments Company Limited (SICL) to be wound up. Mr Al Sanea, a Saudi Arabian national, held shares in certain Saudi Arabian companies which SICL and the liquidators alleged he held for SICL on Cayman Islands trusts, and which they alleged Samba Financial Group (Samba), a Saudi Arabian bank, received from Mr Al Sanea during the winding up. Accordingly, they claimed in the English court against Samba pursuant to IA 1986, s 127, which provides that ‘…[in] a winding up by the court, any disposition of the company’s property […] made after the commencement of the winding up is, unless the court otherwise orders, void’.
Samba applied to the English court to stay the claim on grounds of forum non conveniens, that it was more appropriate for the Saudi Arabian court to hear the dispute. The Chancellor found that the alleged
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234