Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Siward Atkins, barrister at Maitland Chambers (and counsel for the defendant) explores whether a trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) might owe duties to the bankrupt. He argues the message could not be clearer when it comes to the existence of a trustee’s contractual duty of care to the bankrupt—with this case suggesting a trustee cannot owe any contractual duties to protect the interests of the bankrupt.
Reynard v Fox  EWHC 443 (Ch),  All ER (D) 105 (Mar)
While in Oraki v Bramston  EWCA Civ 403,  All ER (D) 174 (May) the Court of Appeal left the door open to a suggestion that a trustee in bankruptcy might owe duties to a bankrupt at common law outside the misfeasance claim given to the bankrupt under section 304 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), in this case the bankrupt tried to push the door open a little further but failed spectacularly. Bankrupts will therefore receive little encouragement from Reynard v Fox on the duty of care owed to them by a trustee in bankruptcy. This case is a nail in the coffin on any suggestion that a trustee can owe contractual duties to protect the interests of the bankrupt. The circumstances would have to be exceptional (and very specific) for any such contract to arise.
The bankrupt (the claimant) made a claim against the former trustee in bankruptcy (the defendant) in connection with alleged breaches of duty owed by him.
The bankrupt first alleged that there was a contract between himself and his trustee under which the trustee w
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Anna joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in August 2013 from Berwin Leighton Paisner where she was a senior associate in the Restructuring Team.
Anna has worked on a number of large scale restructurings primarily in the UK market acting on behalf of lending institutions.
Recent transactions include the restructuring of a UK hotel chain and the administration sale of part of the Connaught group. Anna has also spent time on secondment at The Royal Bank of Scotland and trained at Clifford Chance qualifying in 2007.
0330 161 1234