Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Where a debtor’s share transfer is void and the shares are returned but now have a lower value, is the trustee in bankruptcy entitled to the value of shares as per the date of the transfer? Francis Collaço Moraes, barrister at Three Stone, explores the Chancery Division’s decision in Ingram v Ahmed.
Ingram v Ahmed  EWHC 1536 (Ch),  All ER (D) 11 (Jul)
Following the respondents’ acceptance that the transfers of the first respondent’s minority shares in three companies to the other respondents (his siblings) were void because they were effected after he had been presented with a bankruptcy petition, the Chancery Division held that the applicant trustees in the bankruptcy were entitled to the value of shares as at the date of the transfers. The respondents had argued that such relief would be unprecedented where the shares had been returned and that the trustees had not pleaded or proved actual loss. The court held that the trustees had not been required to plead actual loss, but had proved it, and that the second to the fifth respondents had not acted in good faith and were jointly liable for the loss caused by the fall in value of the shares.
After the presentation of the bankruptcy petition on 23 January 2007, the first respondent had entered an individual voluntary arrangement that was passed as a result of the votes of family members, who claimed to be creditors. That arrangement was successfully challenged in prior proceedings and a bankruptcy order was made on 21 April 2009. Following the appointment of the trustees in bankruptcy, it was asserted that certain shares owned by the bankrupt had been transferred in 2007 to his brother after the presentation of the petition. Some of the shares were subsequently transferred to the other siblings and then transferred back to
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234