Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
What should insolvency practitioners (IPs) consider in light of the recent consultation on proposed revisions to Statement of Insolvency Practice 3 (SIP 3) on company voluntary arrangements (CVAs)?
The Joint Insolvency Committee (JIC) is consulting on a revised SIP 3 for CVAs. Various bodies, including the Insolvency Practitioners Association (IPA), are seeking comments by 7 January 2014. http://www.insolvency-practitioners.org.uk/regulation-and-guidance/sip-consultation
SIP 3 currently covers both CVAs and individual voluntary arrangements (IVAs). In spring 2013, the JIC consulted on a revised version of SIP 3 for IVAs and also announced that steps were being taken to produce separate SIPs for IVAs and CVAs as these were very different processes. The new draft SIP 3.2 (CVAs) should be reviewed in full to consider its impact and implications. However, some of the main points are:
(i) directors to allow them to consider all the options and explain the IP's various roles, and
(ii) shareholders and creditors to consider the CVA proposal.
The proposed revisions to SIP 3 have sparked debate as to whether they go far enough, especially where the IP proposes the CVA or where fees are uncapped. There is also debate as to whether there are conflicts of interest when the IP acts as adviser to the company and subsequently acts as a supervisor.
However, it should be remembered that IPs are heavily regulated and nominees already must report to court on whether the proposed CVA has a reasonable prospect of being approved and implemented.
What do you think? Do the regulations go far enough? We’d love to hear your views. Please leave a comment below.
0330 161 1234