Cut the red tape

Cut the red tape

Creditors could save over £36m by the government’s latest proposals which would cut pointless processes during insolvency proceedings. The proposals are part of the government’s Red Tape Challenge and have been set out for consultation. The consultation will close on 18 July 2013.

What is the government consulting on?

Hot on the heels of the recently announced Trust and Transparency Consultation announced by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), comes another consultation, from the Insolvency Service, called Red Tape Challenge—changes to insolvency law to reduce unnecessary regulation and simplify procedures.

The aim is to consult with insolvency professionals on how insolvency processes can be improved, cutting out unnecessary red tape while retainin

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Restructuring and Insolvency image
Scotland—challenging a liquidator’s decision—the proper approach of the court (Re West Larkin Limited (in liquidation) (No 2))
Restructuring and Insolvency |
5 min read
Restructuring and Insolvency image
An Antiguan liquidator’s powers could not be indirectly extended by reference to unfair prejudice provisions (Re Stanford International Bank Ltd)
Restructuring and Insolvency |
5 min read
Restructuring and Insolvency image
Claim that surgery and insurer colluded in PIP implants settlement rejected (AB and CD v Transform Medical Group and Travelers Insurance)
Restructuring and Insolvency |
3 min read
Restructuring and Insolvency image
Ukraine: Trust ownership as an alternative to a mortgage
Restructuring and Insolvency |
7 min read
Latest Articles:
Exclusive jurisdiction and the ability to confer international jurisdiction on courts in a different Member State (Tiger and Others)
Restructuring and Insolvency |
6 min read
English courts have jurisdiction to appoint administrators in respect of a company incorporated in Gibraltar which had its centre of main interests in the UK (Re Nektan (Gibraltar) Limited)
Restructuring and Insolvency |
8 min read
No jurisdiction for bankruptcy court to stay possession claim (Re Roderick John Lynch)
Restructuring and Insolvency |
6 min read
Setting aside a statutory demand—share sale guarantee liability (Harrling and Steen v Midgley and others)
Restructuring and Insolvency |
4 min read

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:
Eleanor Stephens
Eleanor qualified in 1998 into the insolvency team at ASB law. She became a partner in 2005, and went on to head up the Recovery & Insolvency team. Whilst traditionally specialising mainly in contentious corporate insolvency matters, in recent years she has moved into the non contentious arena, in particular specialising in company administrations.