Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In the recent conjoined Novo Banco cases the court addressed jurisdiction over a loan agreement with an exclusive English jurisdiction clause and considered the interpretation and effect of the European Directive on Bank Recovery and Resolution.
Adam Sher, commercial barrister at Fountain Court and one of the junior counsel acting in the case, takes a look at what this judgment will do to clarify the law in this area.
Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA; Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation as manager and administrator of the New Zealand Superannuation Fund v Novo Banco SA  EWHC 2371 (Comm),  All ER (D) 62 (Aug)
In the defendant bridge institution's application to set aside or stay the claimants' proceedings against it as successor of debts, the Commercial Court found that it had jurisdiction, under Regulation (EU) 2015/2012 (Brussels I (recast)), whichit would not decline to exercise by reason of the principle of non-justiciability or act of state. Further, a stay would not be granted pending the decision of the administrative courts in Portugal, on the basis of case management.
What was the background to the application?
The claimants were successors to the rights of a Luxembourg SPV (Oak Finance) whichhad made a $835m loan (governed by English law and with an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the English courts) to a major Portuguese bank, Banco Espirito Santo SA (BES). BES's parent company fell into financial difficulty, whichled to the intervention of the Portuguese Central Bank (the Bank of Portugal), exercising powers conferred on it as a 'resolution authority' under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD). Pursuant to those powers, and by a decision on 3 August 2014 (the August decision) the Bank of Portugal created a 'bridge bank', Novo Banco (literally New Bank) to whichall liabilities of BES were transferred except certain specified categories of liabilities. On 22 December 2014 the Bank of Portugal issued a further decision (the December decision)
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234