Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Has the Court of Appeal clarified the meaning of ‘establishment’ under the EC Regulation on Insolvency? Kathy Stones looks at the case of Re Olympic Airlines SA  All ER (D) 39 (Jun) which raises the bar for the ‘establishment’ test.
Re Olympic Airlines SA (Olympic) went into liquidation in Greece. Subsequently, the trustees of Olympic’s pension scheme presented a petition to wind-up the company in England. Olympic appealed the judge's finding that it had an 'establishment' in England for the purposes of the EC Regulation on Insolvency, art 2(h). The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal as there was no possible alternative to the conclusion that the definition of 'establishment' had not been fulfilled.
The EC Regulation on Insolvency (EC) 1346/2000, art 2(h) defines establishment as ‘any place of operations where the debtor carries out a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods’.
The Court of Appeal decided that an establishment did not exist in this case and overturned the first instance decision – only two former employees remaining on short term ad hoc contracts for the desultory running down of the business did not constitute the requisite ‘economic activity’.
What is essential is a location where there is still, at the critical date, a business operation (‘a place of operations’ performing ‘economic activity’) such as will justify secondary proceedings in a state outside the state of the centre of main interests.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234