Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Is Re MF Global still good law for the proposition that section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) does not have extra-territorial effect? Marc Brown, a barrister at St Philips Chambers, considers the judgment in the recent case of Official Receiver v Norriss and what it means for practitioners.
Official Receiver v Norriss; subnom Re Omni Trustees Ltd  EWHC 2697 (Ch),  All ER (D) 69 (Nov)
The Chancery Division allowed the official receiver's (OR's) application, under IA 1986, s 236, for an order that the respondent, a Hong Kong resident, was to produce a witness statement, with supporting documents. IA 1986, s 236(3) had extra-territorial effect and, provided the considerations identified in previous authority were satisfied, the court had jurisdiction to require a person resident outside the jurisdiction to submit to the court an account of his dealings with a company, or to produce any books, papers or other records in his possession or under his control relating to the company.
This was the hearing of an application by the OR in his capacity as the liquidator of Omni Trustees Ltd (the company) for an order under IA 1986, s 236 that Mr Tristram Michael Norriss produce a witness statement detailing and exhibiting various matters concerning dealings with the company.
This case concerned the extra-territorial effect of IA 1986, s 236, particularly in light of the decision of the High Court (David Richards J, as he then was) in Re MF Global (UK) Ltd  EWHC 2319 (Ch),  All ER (D) 22 (Aug). The correctness of that decision was challenged in this case.
For further reading on Re MF Global, see blog post: Territoriality following MF Global.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234