Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
A liquidator’s firm was ordered to pay the successful defendants’ costs as a non-party because it had provided funding for the litigation as a commercial funder. On the facts, however, it was appropriate for the firm’s liability to be capped at the amount of the funding it had provided (the Arkin cap). The liquidator was also personally liable for 15% of the defendants’ costs from the time that he had joined the proceedings in order to pursue a claim under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the original claimant being the company in liquidation which was held liable for all the costs). Written by James Potts QC and Matthew Parfitt, barristers, at Erskine Chambers (who appeared for the defendants).
Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Fielding and another  EWHC 2995 (Ch)
Funders, whatever their background, may be required to pay costs as a non-party. While every case turns on its own facts, there is no exemption for supposedly ‘non-professional’ funders, such as an insolvency practitioner’s firm, in circumstances where the provision of funding makes the firm a real party to the proceedings.
Funders will be able to limit their costs exposure by reference to causation and may in an appropriate case have their liability capped at the amount of funding provided (the Arkin cap), although the court is not obliged to impose a cap. In relation to the cap, the court followed the recent decision of Snowden J in Davey v Money  Costs LR 399,  EWHC 997 (Ch), (although an appeal is pending against that judgment, so this is a developing area).
In calculating the Arkin cap, sums provided by the funder to meet adverse costs orders are take
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234