Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
A recent Bank of England (BoE) and European Central Bank (ECB) discussion paper effectively sets out the principle benefits of and impediments to a well-functioning securitisation market, according to the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME). In its response, AFME comments on a number of key issues raised, including the language used to describe qualifying securitisations, the central bank's transaction-based approach and the broadness of the term 'securitisation'.
For the paper see here: BoE and EBC paper
On 30 May 2014, the BoE and ECB issued a discussion paper on the revitalisation of the European market for publicly distributed Asset Backed Securities. The paper outlined the reasons for the shortcomings and the opportunities for improvement of a market, which can complement other long-term wholesale funding sources for the real economy.
Overall, the AFME and its members agree with the analysis presented, believing it effectively sets out the principal benefits of a well-functioning securitisation market and the principal impediments to the development of such a market. The broad features highlighted in the response include:
the language used to describe qualifying securitisations should be as neutral as possible
a positive evolution in the central banks' proposals for qualifying securitisations as compared to previous proposals is the central banks' transaction-based approach
the term 'securitisation' is a very broad term and the criteria suggested in the discussion paper do not always take full account of this
a key aspect of an effective regime for qualifying securitisations is there should be certainty surrounding the categorisation of each transaction
a further aspect of an effective regime for qualifying securitisations is that determinations should be timely
The AFME and its members also agree in broad terms that defining a sub-category of securitisations for differential treatment on the basis of transparency and predictability would be a helpful development.
0330 161 1234