Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
On the hearing of a winding up petition, the court held that the presumption that a company’s centre of main interests (COMI) was in the place of its registered office did not operate as a default. Even where it was difficult to ascertain the actual place of administration of the company’s interests, the court was obliged to conduct that inquiry.
Having determined that no relevant administration was undertaken in the place of the registered office, the court turned to establishing the physical location that represented the centre of its administration albeit that it was said to ‘trade in the ether’. While leaving open the question of whether, under the preamble to the Recast Regulation on Insolvency, the company could be ordered to submit additional evidence to support its assertion as to its COMI (in this case, the company made no positive case), the court was prepared to draw adverse inferences in favour of the petitioner from the company’s silence.
Written by Edward Knight, barrister at XXIV Old Buildings.
Re Melars Group Ltd  EWHC 2090 (Ch),  All ER (D) 18 (Aug)
The judgment demonstrates that the court will be astute to preventing a debtor from taking advantage of an evidential presumption by silence or obscurity and will ensure that a move of registered office reflects a real move of its interests.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234